>>That's interesting. How could the database structure not be compatible with a framework like this?
>
>The database was built in a vertical structure. It had very simple main tables that held a single items of information that were related to other items and only meaningful if translated (translating value and datatype). Most of the guts of the database was in functions and stored procedures that related, assembled, and translated the data. MM.NET wasn't going to handle it and we were not interested in recreating in something MM.NET could use (standard relational database).
>

Thanks for the explanation.