To say that .Net works, however, leaves out quite a few details. C++ works, too. So does Assembly. The issue isn't whether it works, but whether it is tuned to the work we actually do. I think I've made the case here and in my blog entries that .Net in it's statically-typed form does not meet many (and certainly does not meet my) development needs in creating and maintaining large, complex business applications


The above statement is why I have not moved to .Net - it sucks at what I expect a language to do for me.

Johnf