>>>I'd toss most of the african countries (whomever has the guns and a phone that works is in charge today - not much to count on as allies). Some of the others are shakey at best.
>>
>>The list is not mine, is the coalition of the willing list, I am surprised you did not feel embarrassed then, specially when several countries were suspected to be bribed just to appear in the list.
>
>Because, unless it directly affects the interest of a country, a bribe of one type or another has been how countries have always gotten the support of other countries. That has been the case throughout history. There has always been a quid pro quo...
I thought that, at least in the legal sense, you could only bribe a person - i.e. not a country (or any other entity).
Also, there must be an element of corruption ?
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only