>Well perhaps. I did not consider that. As you may have pointed out, I didn't change anything in the previously set data sesion that was working fine using only tables. So what you are saying, is I should remove any buffering settings to the "table to update by the view" (in this case, the child table). Correct? I did not know that. Thanks, I will try that.
>
>Gary
>
>PS I hope you have (had) a nice Easter dinner this evening.

Yes, remove buffering from the table that the view is based on. Only view itself should be buffered, but not the underlying table.

BTW, I don't celebrate Easter, I celebrate Passover. Thanks and hopefully you had a nice time.