>>I think it works OK in SQL Server, but better to use field names. I got confused myself - thanks to Tracy for setting me straight.
>
>Very well, so it all comes down to the mention in Sergey's message about the high traffic in key changes which could have corrupted the index. So, I will have to check that performance on occasional basis.
So, what plans did you get when you tried both suggestions? Can you post them here?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
My Blog