>>>
http://www.defense.gov/npr/>>
>>I've seen a lot of anti-Obama comments regarding this, but it's my understanding that this policy is only a continuation of a policy implemented under GWB. Didn't GWB deadline 2000 nukes while Obama is only doing the same for 200? Isn't the real difference publicly stating in a doctrine (thus enforcing it) when and if those weapons will be considered for use?
>
>I am not up to speed on this information. I noticed the link and posted it for my 'Southern buddies' :) But I liked the new Boeing 747 airborn laser idea. A national umbrella of a few hundred of those might be able to slow most of an attack. AND,
If we get mad at you, we'll come down to the border and yell nasty words in your direction.It would mostly likely work :o)
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
