>>This gets more and more disturbing
>>
>>http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepage/20100416_1_000s_of_Web_cam_images__suit_says.html
>
>No kidding.
>
>"The district has said it turned on the camera in Robbins' computer because his family had not paid the $55 insurance fee and he was not authorized to take the laptop home."
>
>Is that really the position the SD is going to take? They're totally OTL.

Yeah - and 400+ pictures - some when the kid was 1/2 dressed or asleep too. The article said that once the program was turned on it took a pic every 15 minutes....well if there are 400+ pictures they sure as hell left it turned on quite a bit didn't they? I agree with you - their position and argument over the $55 insurance fee is ..ummm...STUPID. Carol Cafiero, the administrator running the program - is a sick twisted person.