>>>>>>>>>>What is your take? Sanctioned from the highest level or renegade?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/18/us.iran/index.html?hpt=T1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>This is probably an ink blot test here in partisan land. I am hoping for honest reactions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>These nutjob muslim fanatics only know one thing - force. Taking to them is like talking to a turnip. If you think for a moment that
>>>>>>>>>this situation with Iran won't end in war then you're naive. They have said repeatedly that they want want to wipe Isreal and the US
>>>>>>>>>off the map. I say, bomb 'em back into the stone age as quickly as we can - before they light off a nuke.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Military airstrikes against specific targets related to the development of the bomb will set them back 20 years. Aside from the threat
>>>>>>>>>of the nuke, Iran is all foam and no beer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>War should be avoided unitl such time as you are attacked. Then and only then (GW) you should wipe their land clean with almost everything you have. Take the capital and erase the enemy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nonsense. The best defense is a good offense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And that is what I said. However, attacking unprovoked (first) will only gain you enemies and lose you respect in the world. Take one on the chin and then pop the perp like a pimple.
>>>>>
>>>>>I disagree with that when it comes to an enemy with weapons of mass destruction. Taking one on the chin can really be taking one on thousands of chins.
>>>>
>>>>American Intelligence is really good. I'm sure you'd get a warning of some sort. I think in the background there is a push to have the Saudi's and their buddies do something. Whether or not it will be successful is another story. Maybe Aminadinnerjacket really is only going to build a power plant (I doubt that). To strike first isn't politically correct. Without proof, it would only serve to enhance the 'great big bully' image. On the other hand, a decisive first strike would get the job done.
>>>
>>>I'm not known for being politically correct ;)
>>
>>Nor I ;)
>>
>>My my! A Frenchman with balls - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36686496/ns/world_news-europe/
>
>He shows some worthwhile qualities. He's probably not native.

I have emailed you a video of the Taliban in action.