>>>Imadinnerjacket is not the first tin pan despot to pull the lion's mane. It plays well at home. He represents no threat to us. He >>may be a threat to Israel, but Israel is armed to the teeth and can take care of itself. We should be less involved in the endless >>strife in the Middle East, not more. IMO we should pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan as decorously as we can and let them all duke >>it out. I don't want to see any more Americans killed in a part of the world where everyone shouts Yee Yee Yee with looks of >>rapture on their faces, their arms waving in the air. Let them continue their 2000 year old jihad, I don't care.
>
>You're so wrong here its scary....
>
>He represents no threat to us.
>The Iranian nutjob president himsel is no threat, and words don't hurt. But the suitcase nuke that his fanatical regime hands to a
>terrorist who slips into LA or NY and lights off is a threat. If they're allowed to get a nuke, the US or Isreal WILL get nuked.
>
>We should be less involved in the endless strife in the Middle East, not more
>I agree that the problems in the Middle East are not ours. But those wacko's seem bent on making it ours. So, lets off them before
>they off us.
>
>Let them continue their 2000 year old jihad, I don't care.
>Again, their jihad is not just over there. It's over here. We're involved whether or nor we want to be. So I say since we have the biggest
>baddest guns, lets use them and end it on our terms.
>
>Again, the best defense is a quick, thorough, offiense.

We really don't have anything to talk about. Best of luck to you.