General information
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Environment versions
Network:
Windows 2003 Server
AFAIR I got the idea out of one of Aleksey T.'s responses - might have misunderstood,
saw no need to verify or even check before. Was just sure I could bump enough
for the mentioned scenarios.
>AFAIK, it's not the case. Before VFP9 IN () was even internally converted into INLIST().
>
>>IIRC In () gets expanded into a cursor in vfp already,
>>so I surmise that SQL server and others in this league implement it such as well.
>>Under this assumption, the In() way of coding is probably the easiest and most
>>portable way to code for things like a filter with a user-defined ad-hoc list of items.
>>
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only