Good Morning Cetin,
don't read me by the words. There is no function definition.
It's a bit a joke and a bit of a way to ignore it.
In a other language a expression
identifier[n,x]
will be the cell of an array, while
identifier(n,x)
will be a function or method call.
a = identifier(x)
identifier(x) = a
might be the use of a collection.
But if you generalize
identifier(x)
as a way to read / write a special item of something
no matter how it is defined It is transparent to you what a language does to write or read.
So this is what I mean that you might "read"
identifier(x)
as a function.
Agnes
>>>So what? You cut your way to calling that function and do you think it is my problem? I don't see how using () instead of [] it made anything good to you.
>>>Cetin
>>
>>There is no function. But you might read it as one if you are unable to read it as an array access.
>
>I am having a hard time to understand you. I don't see what do you mean by "read it as one".
>
>
Dime FishFingers[10,3]
>?FishFingers[1,1]
>
>
>PROCEDURE FishFingers(n,y)
>RETURN m.n * m.y
>endproc
What does it matter if it were () instead? Would then really the function be called?
>Cetin
Words are given to man to enable him to conceal his true feelings.
Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord
Weeks of programming can save you hours of planning.
OffThere is no place like [::1]