Nope.

The agents are in their station IN San Diego. They're IN the US. The people they're questioning are already IN the US. I've gone back
& forth through there a few times. Anyone even attempting to enter the US illegally has commited a felony.

In the eyes of the law, if you're on US soil, whether it's 200 yard across the border, or halfway across the country, and you're here
illegally, you broke the law. They routinely arrest people for crossing into the US. The only thing that's changes is how much they're
going to enforce existing laws and where.

There is no distinction.



>No, the distinction is they are stopping you from ENTERING the US. The federal agents aren't always in the US. When I flew back from Montreal to Detroit, I went through US Customs and Immigration before leaving the Montreal airport.
>
>It's entirely different if you're already well into the US, like my example of Paige, AZ.
>
>>So the federal agents sitting in the entry station in San Diego cannot stop and question someone who's already in the US?
>>They don't have PC. They ask everyone passing through their station trying to enter the US for proof of legal status.
>>
>>You're making a distinction where there is none. In both cases, Police are stopping someone on US soil and asking them to prove
>>that they have a legal right to be in the US. If they won't comply they are breaking the law. If they're not legal citizens, regardless of
>>it's in Paige or San Diego, they are criminals and should be prosecuted.
>>
>>Where this occurs is irrellevant.