>>A good example of the media not doing a good job of notifying the public of the law. The law was changed already. Papers or proof of legal residence in the U.S. can only be asked for if the person is involved in a crime or part of a criminal investigation. However, if go to any of the websites for hispanic support, they all declare the law as profiling or discrimmination without any specifics as to why or how or even the law itself. If you or I are stopped for suspicion of a crime or investigated as part of a crime we have to provide identification as well. I do not see anything discrimmatory about it. The only way it could be discrimminatory is if officers choose to disregard the law and stop for no reason at all. That is an issue for an investigation into police procedures and happens now and then due to profiling as well and should be handled as such.
>
>My concern is that some officers might choose to use minor offenses (things like loitering) as an opportunity to harass people with the blessing of this law. That's essentially what happened to blacks all over the South for decades.
>
>Tamar

There is always that concern for all minorities and that needs to be watched carefully and investigated and prosecuted when it happens just like it is now for all other minorities who may get stopped by profiling. We cannot stop enforcing laws just because the possibility of abusing a law by law enforcement may exist. That is always the case. How many times do pretty girls not breaking any law get stopped by police? Quite often. Of course they are not typically treated unfairly (other than the stop itself). It's not just racial profiling that happens though.