>Thread #1464356
>
>okay, for the slow learners, what did you do to get the link.? I typed what you did and just got text. Tried right-clicking thread link but didn't see where to copy link for pasting.

All I typed is "Thread #" followed immediately by the thread number (no space). You can also do the same for "Message #" followed by the message number. I see from Naomi's post that it also works using "ID:" instead of "#", but I didn't know about that one ... I like "#" better. <g>

~~Bonnie




>
>>Easy: Thread #1462890
>>
>>~~Bonnie
>>
>>>I share your enthusiasm. ( see "Geeked out over XAML" Thread : 1462890 ) <g>
>>>
>>>Just seems weirdly logical. And the VS2010 IDE makes it a lot of fun.
>>>
>>>( and I obviously still do not know how to put a thread link into a message. <s> )
>>>
>>>>A few months back I had a debate with Criag Berston here about WPF. He was advocating WPF, and I was being stubborn.
>>>>
>>>>I started a new job 2 weeks ago. This is one of the best companies I have ever worked for. They are heavily using WPF and MVVM, and I must say, to you Criag, as well as everyone else, that I was wrong, and Craig was right.
>>>>
>>>>WPF is amazing. I am deep into it, and I get it. I go to work each day like a kid in candy store, and I'm slapping myself for not learning
>>>>this sooner. In just 2 weeks I'm reconsidering the way I do software, and I see a brighter horizon.
>>>>
>>>>For all of you still holding out - go to WPF now. It's amazing.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks Craig.