>I disagree STRONGLY. Tough on crime doesn't mean arbitrarily changing sentences and holding people beyond their sentence. Tough on crime means being tough at the time of sentencing and within the law.
>
>Oh, cry me a river - you have GOT to be kidding me. I expected this from others, but not you.
>
>Considering the high amount of corruption in the legal process that leads to soft treatment of these sexually violent predators, I'm glad the Supreme Court decided to tilt things back the other way. If you want to disagree strongly, you know as well as I do where the source of corruption is.

This is quite a tilt. And people thought the Burger court was reactionary.

I notice you had nothing to say about my comments regarding the current court overturning precedents and setting new courses instead of being strict constructionists. No surprise there. There isn't much to say.

It doesn't surprise me that you are untroubled by the Court running the Bill of Rights through a shredder. Call me old fashioned but I kind of like it.