>>Kevin,
>>
>>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37232608/ns/world_news-americas/
>>>>>
>>>>>The most significant part of this article is this:
>>>>>
>>>>>"Almost twice as many people support the Arizona law as those who oppose it, according to an Associated Press poll this month. It found that 42 percent favored it, 24 percent opposed it and another 29 percent said they were neutral. "
>>>>>
>>>>>HELLO!!!! The people WANT this law.
>>>>>
>>>>>This should send a VERY clear message to both Obama and Calderon - your illegals are not wanted here.
>>
>>>>Doesn't that make 53% didn't support it. Also what happened to the other 5%
>>
>>>No, it makes 42% for and 24% against. Those who are undecided are not against it.
>>
>>That still means that 53% did not support it. In many cases decisions it takes more than half or even two thirds of supporting votes because a law to be accepted.
>
>I disagree. The 29% cannot be considered as not supporting. Those who are neutral are ok either way so they cannot be considered as against it. Most often they will fall into the support category when it comes down to implementing a change or not. They only care how many are against it compared to those who support it or are neutral.

Tracy. The 29% is can not be considered as supporting. It cannot be considered as opposing it. So the 29% needs to be included in the 'not supporting' side as well as the not opposing side. Politics is not based opposing, but is on the supporting side. Basically the same discussion as with .T., .F. and NULL values.