Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Why are GUID's bad?
Message
 
 
To
25/05/2010 09:38:22
Timothy Bryan
Sharpline Consultants
Conroe, Texas, United States
General information
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Category:
Database design
Environment versions
SQL Server:
SQL Server 2008
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01465866
Message ID:
01465880
Views:
78
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>I just attended a SQL Saturday in Dallas this past Saturday and I got the impression GUID's were not such a great idea for PK's. I would like to understand why that is, and what is the best choice for tables with lots of records.
>>>Thanks
>>>Tim
>>
>>Identity int (or bigint) fields are generally recommended. If you insist on using GUID, use NewSequentialID() function to generate them.
>
>Naomi,
>
>Can you give me some idea as to why Guid's are no longer the recommended way? There was a day, when GUID's was the recommended key since they were always unique accross all boundary's. An int may be smaller in the db but how on earth would I merge two tables together with an int for the key? I am not advocating either, just trying to get in the know.
>
>What does NewSequentialID() funchtion do that is different?
>Thanks a bunch
>Tim

Take a look at this blog by George Mastros http://blogs.lessthandot.com/index.php/DataMgmt/DBProgramming/best-practice-don-t-not-cluster-on-uniqu I've asked him to expand it.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.


My Blog
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform