>John, there are scientists who CAN be trusted.
>
>The scientists who point out that humans are responsible for less than 5% of atmospheric carbon dioxide...the scientists who point out the long term periodic oscillation in temperatures......the scientists who (I can go on and on)....
>
>And then there is the track record of those proposing recent GWT ideas - regarding their unwillingness to debate GWT opponents.
>
>Tracy made a good point - there is no question we should take proper care of the environment. If humans start to contribute a higher % of atmospheric carbon dioxide, that could affect the balance of things (although the actual math impact there hasn't been determined). But the recent GWT theories in the last several years have been largely discredited.

There you go with the flat statements again. To me that is exactly like saying the recent theories of evolution have been largely discredited. It's a statement that comes with a POV.