>We're using record level rule for this.
Oh, that works? Interesting. I expected that to give you illegal recursion, too. Doesn't the record-level rule fire again, and again, if you replace the timestamp field?
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
