>>>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704312104575299082391565318.html?mod=rss_Today's_Most_Popular
>>>
>>>IMO it would be a false sense of security to ever think we are invulnerable to attack. We weren't exactly babes in the woods the morning of 9/11/01 and an ingenious group still broke through. Security has been ratcheted up since then, dramatically so, but I don't for a minute think it can't happen again, whatever we do. We have lost our innocence.
>>
>>And yet people are actively trying to keep our intelligence, law enforcement, and military arms from being able to prevent another attack. Why do you do that?
>>
>
>Me? You will have to be more specific than that.
>
>The way you word it makes it sound like anyone who questions pitching the principles this country was founded on into the river is un-American or an obstructionist. As an American as loyal as you, I disagree. I definitely do not approve of off-the-charts agencies doing whatever the heck individuals deem apt. Historically that has been a path to societies much worse than ours.
>
>If we turn to neo-fascism to prevent another attack, surely they will have won.

So we lose. That is what is happening, and that is what has happened since the end of WWII because we will not fight to win. We've become 'enlightened'.

Personally, I will fight to win.