>He's advocating debate rather than contradiction. Which actually is a good strategy most of the time unless you are a lawyer. ;-) I don't believe he is saying that you aren't allowed to question a Nobel prizewinner at all, he's suggesting that if they're commenting in their awarded area of expertise then simply to attack their conclusions is a bit antisocial since it stifles reasoned discussion.
I agree with that, but it is NOT what he wrote. Your statement above is nothing close to what he wrote.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
