Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Refox protection, is it useful?
Message
From
13/07/2010 03:49:44
 
 
To
13/07/2010 02:02:22
John Ryan
Captain-Cooker Appreciation Society
Taumata Whakatangi ..., New Zealand
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01471052
Message ID:
01472319
Views:
77
Hi John,

>Just another example of why I'm so impressed with Chen and his VFP Compiler: today I received an updated version with several new features, including a flag that automatically inserts anti-disassembly code in foxrun.c, plus a new compiler directive allowing insertion of C++ or assembly code inside the dll... This, combined with the modified AES Chen has also included as an option inside the C++ dll, makes a VFP-compiled app even more fearfully difficult to hook or hack.

Thatt just looks great:)

My concerns about Chen offers are usability and support. Is this piece of software decently easy to use (I certainly do wish go deep on technicalities) ? Is is commercial enough ? I certainly do look for another etecnologia.

I already use molebox ultra - that offers the significant advantage of xcopy installation - and there are already issues and hiccups there. Since this added protection I'm looking (refox, unfox or why not Chen's tool) for will be added to molebox, it should be a non-brainer!

What is your take on this?
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform