http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
Take look also at this itallian documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-YqET96OO0
Now if you decide to use eyes & brain, then you don't even need any studies to realize that official story is bunch is bananas. Srdjan, if YouTube videos are your source of a huge claim that the U.S. govt planted explosives in the buildings, then I actually feel a bit sorry for you.
Second, with regard to your post that cites the Open Chemical Physics Journal - they are a pay-to-publish online journal (i.e. a vanity publisher) with no track/impact record in the field of science. To call them "peer-reviewed" is a long-shot.
Third, architects who initially said, "the buildings were constructed to withstand the impact of planes" have backed off on those claims.
Fourth, and perhaps most important - the claim of thermite in the dust has been debunked a proverbial thousand times over. I don't feel compelled to provide all the information to someone who is not likely to pay much attention to it, but a few major facts right away:
- Thermite doesn't make clean cuts (a claim vital to the 9/11 conspiracy theorists) - it makes ugly holes wtih molten metal drips/blobs, and burns chaotically. No one has ever been able to demonstrate that thermite can cut vertical columns in a building of that size.
- It's been estimated that TONs of thermite would have been needed to trigger the kind of damage that occured on 9/11
- The claims of diphenylpropane present, turned out (and verified by the EPA) to have resulted from the burning of plastic from thousands of computers.
The "research" from 9/11 conspiracy theorists has been panned as bad research, bad science, or intentional deception - reminds me of ClimateGate.
