>>>>
http://abcnews.go.com/US/TheLaw/videotaping-cops-arrest/story?id=11179076>>>
>>>Warning: the article supposedly has a video of the recording, with the image of the cop, but when you run it, there's an ad, unskippable.
>>>
>>>Welcome to the police state. The arguments on which this law was passed is the best proof of the intent to inaugurate Big Brother as CiC.
>>
>>Actually the law was passed to protect the private citizen. However, when the law was passed, they failed to include exceptions for public and/or government employees
filmed by private citizens in the course of their jobs.
>
>And you fully believe the failure was accidental?
No, I didn't mean to imply that.
>
>There's something fishy when laws are written so that they are full of exceptions, or need to be full of them, to start making sense. Laws should be simple.
There's always something fishy going on. :o) The question is whether or not we know about it....
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
