>
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/28/court-university-expel-student-opposes-homosexuality/
>
>Sexual deviation will soon be mandatory. >
>If I read the report correct, this is the 1% of the time where I see it differently.
>
>"..she refused to counsel homosexual clients.".
>
>I'll be the first to say that I don't care for some of the political lobbying that has gone on for certain public interest groups (and this is one of them). But if this woman indeed refused to counsel homosexual clients, then AFAIAC the dismissal was warranted. If I (hypothetically) refused to help one of my students because of similar views, I would expect to get the boot as well.
>
>So unless there's more to this story, I don't see the issue.
Not only homosexuality can conflict with a counselor's or physician's point of view over what is and what isn't correct; promiscuous behavior is another area that will strike many as inappropriate. A counselor or physician will indeed have to put aside his personal (or religious) opinions on this matter.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
