>This is actually an easy one.
>
>In most instances, an employer will have rules and policies. I'm guessing this woman violated the policies of the university (I believe the university stated as such).
>
>As a contractor, I've turned down work a few times, if the juice wasn't worth the squeeze - but not for the reasons you specified.
>

I think you're evading the question. But let me re-phrase. Under what conditions do you think it reasonable for somebody to refuse a service beyond things like inability/refusal to pay. In my case, were I a criminal lawyer I would not take on as a client an avowed Nazi and defend him/her even on a charge having nothing to do with those beliefs. Is that a valid reason given that I'm Jewish and am somewhat prejudiced against Nazis?

>Personally, I think this woman who tried to sue the university is a dumbass.
I think her belief system is hopelessly wrong. But her beliefs are honestly held and I accord her the same rights not to provide services to homosexuals that I want for myself regarding Nazis.

That's why I phrase it as "where do you draw the line?"

Religious beliefs?
Political beliefs?
Lifestyle?
Prior criminal activities?
?????