>>>>>But the problem is that it negates public votes. Why vote if because some majority doesn't like it it could be overturned? The majority ruled here, and the other half doesn't like it.
>>>>
>>>
>>>What if 95% of the state's population voted for something that might be unconstitutional? Should it be overturned? The will of the people is far more weighty in my opinion and should be a major deciding factor.
>>
>>It would still be unconstitutional. But with such a majority, I don't see much of a problem to change the constitution.
>
>If it became "not a problem" to change the Constitution, then that cheapens the Constitution. It's difficult to change by design.

I know - but 95% is supposed to be up to the task.