On an XP machine with 2 cpus I got a before of 25 seconds and an after of 5 seconds.


>It's my understanding that there's no parallel execution of the code in ParallelFox because you have only 1 extra CPU = 1 Worker but extra expenses for launching the worker and executing the code through COM.
>
>>OK. So now that you know I have "2", does that give you enough information to answer my initial question - why does the "after" code run slower than the "before" code for those two examples?
>>
>>
>>