Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Hot Stock Tip
Message
 
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01468147
Message ID:
01476090
Views:
50
>>>>>>>>>>I'm reading still large packets being unloaded:
>>>>>>>>>>on the mass sold between 8:00 and 8:15 the dip betwen previous day
>>>>>>>>>>and the spread for the rest of the day is more than pocket change...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>But it is coming nicely into the area where one can wait for a few years and still get a nice average return ;-))
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>We're bouncing back nicely here in the States today. BP finished strong, up 12.8% and very close to intraday high.
>>>>>>>>>It should be noted that yesterday's low of $29, was a bounce off a fibonacci line using the 1992 low. 18 years in the making!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Just a few minutes to see if another bulk package will be unloaded after opening up for the day.
>>>>>>>>Wonder how many daytraders have picked up on thsi pattern and are gambling on it...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>thomas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's 9:41pst and something, I'm not sure what exactly, but something is happening. On the open it headed down to 29.85 with the Congressional grandstand party, His Obamaness' pending Oval Office address to tell us weeks later how in charge he is and the pending dividend announcement. That made sense. About an hour ago, the stock shot straight up to 32. It now sits at 31.50.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>SET HEAD SCRATCH ON
>>>>>>
>>>>>>We are in somewhat rare agreement. The timid handling of the Gulf disaster was not his finest hour. I know sometimes he holds back because of ceaseless resistance but I would like to have seen more passion.
>>>>>
>>>>>Welcome back Mike!
>>>>
>>>>Thanks, Jake.
>>>>
>>>>I just saw in the headlines that Ted Stevens was killed in a plane crash. I should not speak ill of the dead but he was one of our very worst senators. He was a living argument for term limits.
>>>>
>>>>The CA senate race is getting a lot of coverage. I am quite certain Barbara Boxer is not your favorite but Carly Fiorina is as nasty as they come. Much nastier than I suspected.
>>>
>>>Oh yeah! It's a real tough choice we have ahead of us. On the one hand we have a career politician who has never created a job in her life, but has managed to vote affermitive on nearly every single business killing piece of legislation that has come before her in her 2 terms of preachy envio-nutjob activism. On the other hand we have a career businesswoman, credited with breaking the business glass ceiling to become the head of a fortune 20 company. Once recognized as one of the most powerful women in business (Time, Fortune) She is on the boards of multiple businesses and the board of trustees at MIT. In the present time of economic malaise whoever shall I choose? ;)
>>
>>Read a little more about her. She is a nasty piece of work. I have never had a problem with women in business. My opinion has changed. That attack ad she ran against Tom Campbell in the primary was vicious even by the standards of election campaigns.
>>
>>This country has slipped to the right and Barbara Boxer is beatable. But lord, I don't want it to be Carly Fiorina. Not from our biggest state.
>
>I would take a monkey shooting darts at yes/no boxes over Boxer at this point. At least then we'd have a shot at being fairly represented.

Do you mean represented right? ;-)
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform