>>>http://www.news10.net/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=68596
>>>
>>>Big 5 has a sale going, They're selling 9mm Luger ammo at 14.99 a box. That's down from 21.99 a box. At that price I'm going to run down & get some because come february qwhen this new lawy takes affect, the price of ammo will go through the roof.
>>>
>>>Given enough regulations wrapped around , even a constitutional right stops being a right.
>>
>>What is so insiduous about this? As I am reading it the new requirement is that bullets in gun shops be kept out of reach. I have no problem with that.
>>
>>It also strikes me as an NRA-inspired publicity campaign. The new enactment is buried among many others in an end of term catchup bill. I suspect it will have very little effect on life in California other than to shoplifters of bullets in gun shops. My suspicion is only the eagle eyed would have even noticed. Blam, wabbit!
>
>1) The law requires that the customer provide a fingerprint. I thought the constitution protected me from illegal search & seizure??
>2) Ammo cannot be mail ordered into CA any more? What morin dreamed this one up?
>3) The price of ammo will now go through the roof
>
>This is just another attempt to keep guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens. What's next? A DNA sample?
>
>Good thing I live a few hours from AZ. I can simply drive there & buy my ammo.

Kevin, let me get this straight, and please do not take it as a personal attack. I respect you for having served in the armed forces and your libertarian posts here. Please tell me why it is an infringement on anyone's rights that ammo not be kept in the front case. I sincerely don't get it.