We had better make sure that Skynet doesn't take up the cause as one of its prime directives. <vbg>

>>What clause in the Clean Air Act worries you, the one that says systematic eradication of all CO2 producing entities <vbg>
>
>LOL!
>
>
>>>*snip* - Let's agree to agree. ;)
>>>
>>>> I would worry to much about it as non of the proposed changes will be able to be implemented as the upcoming Economic Recession/Depression will put said to that.
>>>
>>>Another reason I've, until this week, disengaged.
>>>
>>>My only concern here in the states is with our EPA. They're attempting to bypass the legislature and implement a CO2 regulatory scheme by fiat.
>>>
>>>Step 1, declare CO2 a pollutant. Check!
>>>Step 2, rewrite the Clean Air Act to accomodate Step 1
>>>
>>>Regardless of the fact that the EPA has no constitutional authority whatsoever to rewrite legislation, they're pushing forward. This is where the fight lies. CO2 is not a pollutant and until that declaration is reversed (or the EPA dissolved-my hope for change) there is still a trmendous danger to our little remaining liberty.