>Hi David,
>
>Someone at the Info World website just wrote a specious and misleading review of Y2KFox. He doesn't discuss whether it performs as advertised or not, just whether the solution is provides is the appropriate one for your use. But he presents it as though it does not perform as advertised. (I do detest journalists.)
>
>But the article raises a question.
>
>If I have a date field where I have SET CENTURY ON and have the user entering a 4-digit year, does Y2KFox re-interpret that year? In other words, if the user has typed in 1910 and I have my rollover set to 15, will it change that year to 2010?
>
>TIA
>
>:-) Pamela

Hi Pamela,
If you have a date field __/__/____ and the user enters 01/01/01__ which you can do in a four digit year , it will become 1/1/2001. If you explicitly enter 1910 then it will save as 1910.
What did the Info World claim was a problem?

BTW the developer has provided me with a possible fix to the CPU utilisation, which I'm about to test. To me, the product looks great!