>>>Not just angry white people but angry middle and older aged white people. Look up the demographics and get back to me, OK?
>>
>>And why, exactly, does that make their concerns or anger invalid? If one were to characterize a protest as "just a bunch of angry young black people" would that make their concerns not worth considering?
>>
>>If you have issues with their issues, fine, but you are arguing against *who* they are, not what they believe.
>
>I am arguing against what they believe. It sure aren't the principles this country was founded on.
I missed that message(s) entirely then. Could you PLEASE give me a link to it (them)? I haven't read a single message by you that I recall regarding what the tea party believes or stands for.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"