>>>>>>>>Assuming that the US could actually do something to help Mexico, and they actually wanted to turn their country around, what then? Who's next? Does the US keep reaching out to the rest of the world when the rest of the world doesn't give a shit about the US? How much foreign aid comes INTO America?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I agree with your point as far as it goes, but you may misunderstand me. It doesn't have to do with the corrupt government or the economic s-hole of Mexico. It has to do with seeking better opportunities for your family. Please tell me you wouldn't do the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I wouldn't do the same
>>>>>
>>>>>Nor would I. What would they be teaching their children? Its okay to break the law if I want to give you a better life.
>>>>
>>>>Yes, I think it is, and that may be our fundamental difference. Not claiming I am right -- it's just my POV.
>>>
>>>I'm curious how far breaking the law is ok in your view then. What else is it ok for them to do? Rob a bank? Steal from the grocery store? Steal a car? Break into homes and steal another person's belongings? Anything they think they need to do for a better economic life?
>>
>>I think there is a pretty profound difference between those things and walking across a border. Your arguments are usually much stronger than this.
>
>Your response makes no sense whatsoever. Perhaps you were drowsy? I was not arguing for or against. Please read my message again. It is very clear. I was asking you a question, because based on your message, I am curious as to where you draw the line or if you do.

I do not blame people for immigrating for economic reasons. I do blame them for robbing banks, holding up stores, stealing cars, or breaking into homes. Hopefully this clears my position up.

Please don't forget you actually agreed with me on this -- you would do the same to make a better life for your daughter and you. You said that. Sometimes I think you just like being argumentative ;-)