>>
>>I think there is a huge difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion. I don't think many people at all are pro-abortion. There are a lot of people who believe in a woman's right to choose.
>>
>I call BS on the semantics of the term "Pro-choice"
>
>The "Pro-choice" people have defined "Right to choose" into something that is not supported by the English language.. You ALWAYS have the right to CHOOSE ANY ACTION. What you don't have is the right to make that choice and avoid any legal sanctions for that action.
>
>I may believe in mercy killings and want the right to choose to put my father out of his pain-filled life. Would you allow me to have that choice? If the answer is no then your definition of "Pro-Choice" is inconsistent.
>
>To reduce it to a more absurd level.
>
>I may believe that it is OK to walk up to somebody and steal their money because I need a new computer. Would you allow me that choice? If the answer is no then your definition of "Pro-Choice" is inconsistent.
>
>What "Pro-Choice" really means is "I may not approve of that choice, but I believe that abortion should be legal and that those who choose to have one should not face any legal consequences."
>
>Or rephrase it to "I don't believe in abortion but don't believe it is sufficiently evil in the way (fill in your favorite crime) is and that society should not make laws making it illegal"
>
>Pro-Choice may not be Pro-abortion but it is most definitely Pro-Legalized-Abortion.
>
>FWIW, I tend to favor legalized abortion with many stipulations. I strongly dislike that people hide their beliefs behind "Right to choose"

I'm really glad that you and John posted what you did. I had been throwing around this idea in my head for a few weeks unable to put it into words. Thanks!