>>>>>>>In the sense of what protection under the law she had (NONE) while there. You do know it's constitution and laws are all based on the Qur'an and Shari'a law, right?
>>>>
>>>>Please tell me where it is written in the Qur'an that it is allowed to hammer nails into someone ?
>>>
>>>I never wrote that it was. I stated where the legal system comes from - which is also their religion and custom. Please do not ascribe words or meanings to what is not there. It is a question of protection under the law. In Saudi Arabia, women need their guardian's permission for most medical treatment and elective surgery. They cannot even drive cars or travel without a male guardian. The maid was not allowed to roam freely around the country to see a doctor or to leave.
>>>
>>>I think you should at least read this to understand why I stated (the point of my post) that women have little if any protection under the law and even less for female migrant workers:
>>>
>>>http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2004/07/14/saudi-arabia-foreign-workers-abused
>>>
>>>It is a religious issue as well because everything there: the customs, the law etc and religion are all intertwined. Do you really not understand that? I never wrote that the Qur'an or Shari'a law advocated driving nails into a female maid....
>>
>>Religion is just a means to an end to them. It's still essentially a feudal society with far too much money and supported by the US. A disgrace really.
>
>Good thing Belgium doesn't support them.

No need to include Jean and his country in the blame. He is one of the most sensible people here.