>>>Does Transactional Replication require a timestamp or other field to know that a record has been changed? As far as I can tell, the answer is No, but I want to confirm.
>>>
>>
>>No it doesn't. It uses transaction log where all the changes are recorded.
>
>That what I needed to know. Thanks!
>
>(Hmmm... did the CC feature go away? I was gonna CC Naomi on this, but I don't see it. I guess it has been a while since I tried to use it.)
PUTM can opt to exclude themselves from the cc list (it's a UT feature).
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
My Blog