>>We're talking SQL Server cursors here - not VFP.
>
>Yes, I know. If you have a reason to believe they are worse in SQL please enlighten me.
I posted a link - just one more time
http://wiki.lessthandot.com/index.php/Cursors_and_How_to_Avoid_Themand if this is not convincing, try to run a cursor on, say, 100K table to update each record with some value and then do the same SET based and compare the speed.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
My Blog