Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Poor baby!
Message
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01479862
Message ID:
01479973
Views:
50
>>>>>>>http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/09/02/muslim-soldier-refuses-deploy-afghanistan/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>He should be billed for every expense the military paid for his training, living expenses, transportation expenses, legal expenses, medical expenses, etc before being booted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I hope interfering with military readiness can be a chargeable offense against him for causing the military to waste their time on him rather than training an American soldier.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Let him go fight against us so we can shoot him properly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Religion of peace. My butt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Are your sentiments confined to the case in point or to the treatment of concientious objectors in general ?
>>>>>
>>>>>RE:" As a Muslim, we stand against injustice, we stand against discrimination, and I feel it's my duty as an individual to do this." What the h*ll does he think is the reason for the military to be in Afghanistan? They are there fighting injustice and a lot of other crap. My country has a (relatively speaking) sizable group FIGHTING and rebuilding too. The only injustice I see is he took the oath, and no doubt did it with his left hand on the Quran, and now he is reneging. Send him to Guantanamo to help out. Or, he might like being a medic in a field hospital so he can see what the" 'they are muslims so they must be peaceful " taliban do to our people. What a doorknob, what a knucklehead, what maroon.
>>>>
>>>>Quite a rant Grady, but it didn't answer my question. OTOH maybe it did.....
>>>
>>>No it didn't - but it will be interesting to see if you get a straight answer or not.
>>>
>>>My beef with this case is that the guy's only been in the military a year - so he knew when he joined where the fighting was - so how the heck can he be a conscientious objector now? If that's the case then he shouldn't of joined in the first place - so the "conscientious objector" argument doesn't hold up for me when he volunteered to begin with - all the while knowing where we were fighting....if he had been drafted into service I'd think it'd require a closer look - but not as it stands.
>>
>>I agree.
>
>What? You can't AGREE with me! How am I gonna be able to sleep tonight knowing that?!

Add me to the list :o)

It is not common, but there are folks (not saying this is the case here) who join the military for the job training and guaranteed paycheck and then when mobilized, all of a sudden develop a conscientious objector status. Now in peace time, a few here and there are folks trying to ride the system, but in this case when we have had wide-spread military operations on-going for YEARS, and the oath is VERY CLEAR and every option to back out before taking the oath is provided, there is no excuse.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform