>The two systems are as follows:
>P200 Pro w/32Mb RAM - Running W98
>vs.
>P166 w/32Mb RAM, then we upgraded to 64Mb RAM - Running W95
>(There didn't seem to be any significant difference between the 32Mb and 64Mb with this problem.)
>
>>I've noticed problems w/ MMX chips regarding display. Is there any difference between your 166 and 200 in any regard besides speed rating? ie: one is a knockoff...

There is a huge difference between a Pentium and a Pentium Pro. The Pentium is a 586 and the Pentium Pro is a 686. The Pentium Pro runs 32 bit code faster than a Pentium at the same clock speed, while a Pentium runs 16 bit code faster than a Pentium Pro at the same clock speed. The Pentium II is a repackaged Pentium Pro with MMX.

The "knockoff" issue could be important. Foxpro treats all numbers as double precision floating point. This means that Foxpro really benefits from a fast math coprocessor. The math coprocessor functions of nonIntel CPUs are not as fast as Intel's.