If they even agree to here the case.... I'm thinking they won't. From the article:
"We have thoroughly and critically reviewed the government's public and classified declarations and are convinced that at least some of the matters it seeks to protect from disclosure in this litigation are valid state secrets," they had see the matters and the state secrets in order to make that call. On the other hand, we are placing the call in a small number of individuals. It does in fact support the other statement in the article:
"If this decision stands," Wizner said, "the United States will have closed its courts to torture victims while extending complete immunity to its torturers.">Hopefully the Supreme Court will see it differently as they're not subject to political pressures.
>
>>Sometimes it looks so similar to the last administration that you really cannot tell the difference:
>>
>>
Appeals court dismisses Boeing-CIA lawsuit>>
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2010/09/08/1029026?sac=Home
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"