>>Well, since Roy Halladay's numbers are much strong than Lincecum's, I thought I'd compare Lincecum to Philly's 2nd starter, Cole Hamels.
>>
>>Lincecum has a better winning % than Hamels, though Hamels has had one of the lowest run support figures in MLB.
>>
>>Their numbers are interesting...
>>
>>
>>Lincecum: 14- 9, ERA of 3.60, 30 starts, 208 Ks, 70 BBs, WHIP 1.30, opponent BA .247
>>Hamels: 11-10, ERA of 3.01, 30 starts, 201 Ks, 56 BBs, WHIP 1.16, opponent BA .233
>
>Hamels has been terrific.
>
>BTW, I noticed an interesting stat the other day when Halladay pitched. It was his 30th start and his record was 17-10. (He won, so is now 18-10.) To have only two starts where he didn't get the decision is incredible. I wonder if there's anybody else with that kind of record this year.
>
That is a high number. He pitches late into games so it's not completely surprising that he gets a lot of decisions.
He pitches tonight against the Marlins, with some guy with an ERA of nearly 6 opposing him. You have to like the Phillies' chances.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only