Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
This weeks overturned conviction(s).
Message
Information générale
Forum:
News
Catégorie:
Social
Divers
Thread ID:
01481509
Message ID:
01481522
Vues:
31
>>>>This time two guys spent 30 years for something they didn't do.
>>>>http://www.kansascity.com/2010/09/16/2228350/miss-judge-frees-2-men-wrongly.html
>>>
>>>And OJ's still walking around laughing about getting away with multiple killings.
>>
>>Think about it. OJ didn't really get away with it. Yes, he was found innocent in the criminal trial by a carefully chosen jury. Anyone who thinks trials can't be decided in the jury selection stage don't need to look any further. But anyone who watched any amount of that trial knows he did it. The evidence was overwhelming. His blood at the crime scene, the victims' blood in his car. Time, motive, opportunity.
>>
>>Still, he was transformed from an American idol to a pariah. Reportedly he can't even get golf partners. He's not behind bars but he is paying. Personally I can't imagine a much worse fate than being treated as a murderer everywhere you go when you were accustomed to being treated as a hero. Yes, he should be in prison, but his is a punishment cunning enough for the Greek gods.
>>
>>He was convicted in the civil case. The last I heard he was not paying what he is supposed to, hiding out in Florida where they can't take your house.
>
>He is in prison, but not for murder (I forgot about that too when I originally posted).
>
>He should have fried years ago.
>
>That is what you can get when you can racially stack a jury. You couldn't have stacked it the other way because that would be racist.

The whole case was a blunder from the start - to begin with they should of kept the case in Santa Monica where it belonged.

* I got the info below from here: http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/simpson/jurypage.html

Some other facts about the final jury: (1) None regularly read a newspaper, but eight regularly watch tabloid TV shows, (2) five thought it was sometimes appropriate to use force on a family member, (3) all were Democrats, (4) five reported that they or another family member had had a negative experience with the police, (5) nine thought that Simpson was less likely to be a murderer because he was a professional athlete.

The racial composition of the jury was strongly influenced by the decision of the prosecution to file the Simpson case in downtown Los Angeles rather than--as is usually the case-- in the judicial district where the crime occurred-- in this case, Santa Monica.
ICQ 10556 (ya), 254117
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform