>Over a year ago there were many MVC, MVP, MVVM discussions here. The more commonly used architecture is MVVM , but it's good to be familiar with them all (if you want to be marketable).

Hmmh, interesting links... I personally set my sights early on MVP as a base line, but with unspoken assumption that further properties were needed on the Presenter. Now I see that this characterizes the switch from P to VM - in my personal classification shorthand I equated the difference between P and VM as the VM having a different (denormalized, aggregated or else transformed) data structure/schema from the original table layout. Plain wrong on my side or a possible/arguable definition ?

regards

thomas