Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Drop dead
Message
De
01/10/2010 14:01:17
 
 
À
01/10/2010 09:45:09
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Titre:
Divers
Thread ID:
01483299
Message ID:
01483541
Vues:
31
>>AFAIC, it's unconstitutional for school games. It's also wrong.
>>
>>That's upsurd. Show me where in the constitution where it says a group of students cannot voluntarily join together and pray before a came. I emphasise voluntarily here bceause that's exactly what this was - people choose to excersice their first ammendment right to pray whenever and wherever they want. This was not a city/league organized or sactioned event.
>>
>>So how exactly is this wrong???
>
>What you quoted from me above wasn't about the story we're now discussing. It was about school games, and particularly _public_ school games.
>
>Kids can individually and, in small groups, choose to pray together. No problem there. The issue is when it's a team activity or led by an adult who's involved with the team. Then there's an issue of coercion, whether real or implied.
>
>I think there's a gray area when it's, say, the team captain leading the prayer, since that also has a whiff of coercion.
>
>Tamar

Agreed. The even murkier situation is when the team captain or coach participate in the prayer, but don't lead it. That alone can create a sense of coercion or pressure even if not intended...
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform