Thanks

>In a nutshell, it is not worth the hassles of trying to save money on anything less than TS, unless they have high end comms, which this client wouldn't have.
>Just trying to save you a lot of headaches.
>
>>><snip> I guess if the cost for TS/RDS or Citrix is too much for the client we can look at the VPN and using SQL Server and see if that will be fast enough for them.
>>>
>>>Just verify who is going to pickup the costs involved with the extra support. Remember you are saying that this topology is OK, and if there are problems you will be in the crosshairs.
>>>
>>>With your comment about the costs, in this case if the client can't afford the costs to do the remote comms properly they can't afford remote access, you do not need the hassles.
>>
>>
>>At this point I have no idea on what the RDS costs are nor what the client is willing to pay. As of now is I have two companies recommending a solution, with that I will go to the client and discuss the options. I see two possible outcomes:
>>
>>1. The client decides that RDS is the way to go and can afford it.
>>
>>2. The client decides they cannot afford RDS but are willing to TRY the cheaper VPN solution. If so then they will be fully aware that it is experimental.
>>
>>From your responses I guess you have been here before. I would appreciate it if you could expound a bit on what your experiences were.