Hi Michel,

Why does the fact that VB being object based make it less of a RAD Tool? It's interesting, many folks jump on the OO aspect of VFP when comparing to VB. Yet, if you looked at many of the apps those folks write - many of them are'nt really OO anyway.

With tools like FoxExpress, I could employ many RAD Techniques in Fox 2.x.

I just don't understand the conclusion you are making here.

I could easily make the argument that in some respects, VB supports RAD better, Intellisense, better Windows API Integration, etc.

I think many folks have issues with VB because they do not know how to use the tool. If you attempt to take a VFP mindset to VB ,you will run into problems. The same would be true for VB developers trying to use VFP.




>>3. VB owns 80% of the rad tool's market. Somehow, 80% if the developers out
>> there are not casual users. This only goes to support point one above.
>
>That's an interesting point. I thought we couldn't use VB to do RAD. I used it at several occasions so far and I found it far from being a RAD tool. I searched for RAD product and couldn't found one either. It's true it might be difficult to do RAD as we do it in VFP as it is object based.