>>/edit/
>>
>>The third point has to be the selection process, something about which I had commented in the past: this time there was a community rep involved who clearly was satisfied with the process as I am confident she would have spoken out by now otherwise. So justice is done and is seen to be done. Congrats all around. ;-)
>
>The winners and the panel are all exemplary and have my congratulations.
>
>The "community rep" didn't represent me. Frankly I doubt any one would dare speak out against the judges, so that proves nothing. The panel is completely trustworthy and there was no need of a community rep.
The winners were decided based on votes. From the candidates pool each "judge" sent Doug 2 candidatures each felt the best. And then based on the count winners were decided.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
My Blog