>>>>http://www.poodwaddle.com/worldclock.swf
>>>
>>>I somehow don't trust the accuracy of these numbers. Not even to the first significant digit.
>>
>>I dont know. I would guess that they are averaged approximations since there is no real-time feed for the data.
>
>Exactly. All of the numbers are guesstimates at best. Given the amount of money the alarmists have, and have had over the last 50 years or more (when was Roman club, sixties?), and the money they are about to lay their hands on via carbon[hydrates] tax, I wouldn't be surprised if they were exaggerating a lot. It pays, handsomely.

Why do you assume that the data is supplied by 'alarmists' ?
(There's a 'Sources' link on the page BTW)