Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
One row at a time vs. all rows
Message
 
 
Information générale
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Catégorie:
Autre
Versions des environnements
SQL Server:
SQL Server 2005
Divers
Thread ID:
01487153
Message ID:
01487303
Vues:
45
How you're planning to learn SQL Server if you avoid using even when it's appropriate?

>My "usual" answer would be because I know VFP a little better than SQL Server. But I do now work on using a stored procedure for this. Is this what you meant with your question?
>
>>Why bring data in VFP if you don't have to?
>>
>>>
>>>I have not yet done much of measurements of time comparison between one method or another. I am working on the "stored procedure" approach which - theoretically - should be the fastest. And honestly I am not much concerned about the speed of this procedure. This procedure will be done very infrequently so 10 seconds (or 1 minute) more or less won't make a difference. The reason I posted the question is to make sure that my "approach" will not impose unnecessary load on SQL Server and therefore upset a DBA.
>>>
--sb--
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform